Poetry is inherently difficult because its understanding requires three forms of knowledge:
The denotative meaning of words. That is, words "alone."
The connotative meaning of words. That is, words "in context."
And the archetypal meaning of words. That is, "hyper-contextual words"--words not in the context of the poem itself but in their historical use.
A well-written poem combines the three required forms of knowledge to create meaning on multiple levels--that is, "depth."
The problem with many poems is the direct neglect of one (or more) of these forms of knowledge--creating far more difficult--and ultimately less satisfying--works at the expense--or on the altar of "progress."
Once we understand that the arts do not progress--and that this includes poetry, we can embrace poetry for its inherent artistic value.
This means accepting that poetry, on its face, is "difficult"--moreso than prose--because it requires a greater depth of knowledge--and that there is little point in making it intentionally more difficult (to show ones "intelligence" perhaps?) in order to satisfy some overthought and overwrought "need" of the author.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Why Poetry is Difficult
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment